Teams

A:MIS:4.0 MIS Ladies:Johnson

2023 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Women 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-02-11vs A:RH:Rockettes:Baron/BaronWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Buteau / Claire Steppan vs Liz Cummings / JoAnn Lopez6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJessica Cote vs Becky Freiberg2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Onorato / Colleen Kluberdanz vs Shawna Baron / Lucille Dunn6-4, 6-2
2022-12-17vs B:MIL:Lady Bulldogs:DellacroceSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Kate Buteau vs Jennifer Dellacroce / Elena Miko6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesStephanie Marchand vs Lieselotte Sippel0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Onorato / Colleen Kluberdanz vs Salam Turki / Joyce Somers6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDana Johnson / Sarah Steverman vs Amanda Weber / Deb Parnes3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Kate Buteau vs Junjira Sookvaree / Jamie Stasko6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDana Johnson / Kristen Onorato vs Carol Lange / Susan Haven6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Searle / Kate Welch vs Ida Zhang / Ayo Haynes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-11-20vs B:NHH:Double Shots:McCarthy/DemersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Dirico / Suzanne Ellery vs Nancy Inglese / Kristin Daley2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKate Buteau vs Melissa Puccio4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDana Johnson / Claire Steppan vs Kirsten Page / Melissa Barra6-7, 1-4
2022-11-19vs A:LS:McAuliffeLost 13
W#1 DoublesAmy Dirico / Suzanne Ellery vs Laurie Zrenda / Abi Cushman7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Anna Slopak4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Steppan / Kristen Onorato vs Lisa Mazzucco / Leah Ward2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDana Johnson / Stephanie Marchand vs Lisa Dibacco / Hally Schoen5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-10-22vs A:RH:Rockettes:Baron/BaronWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Onorato / Jessica Kirwan vs Judit Farkas / Kirstyn Davidson6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStephanie Marchand vs Kristen Feld4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Kate Welch vs Shawna Baron / Janet Baron6-3, 6-0
2022-10-15vs B:GF:Fire and Ice:ParkerWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Dirico / Kristen Onorato vs Jane Farrington / Dani Woods6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Teresa Panico0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesClaire Steppan / Kate Welch vs Janet Burton / Mary Barnes6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSky Hoyt / Dana Johnson vs Kim Brunstad / Catherine Dinauer6-2, 6-2
2022-10-01vs A:OSB:4.0 W:O'Neil/GriffinWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Suzanne Ellery vs Eileen Griffin / Caitlin McDonough6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Johnson / Amy Searle vs Kathy Pavelcak / Kathryn Hanly1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Marchand / Kate Welch vs Eileen Duggan / Crystal Cowles3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-24vs A:OSB:4.0 W:O'Neil/GriffinWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Welch / Claire Steppan vs Mary O'Neil / Kathryn Hanly6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesStephanie Marchand vs Crystal Cowles2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesColleen Kluberdanz / Kristen Onorato vs Eileen Griffin / Christine Schneider5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-17vs A:LS:McAuliffeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Kate Buteau vs Laurie Zrenda / Leah Ward6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Marchand vs Lisa Belliveau7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaire Steppan / Jessica Kirwan vs Connie Hurtt / Lisa Dibacco6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDana Johnson / Amy Searle vs Hally Schoen / Doreen Fratoni7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1B:MIL:Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce01030928285
2B:NHH:Double Shots:McCarthy/Demers010241432302
3A:MIS:4.0 MIS Ladies:Johnson010202044347
4B:GF:Fire and Ice:Parker010182044353
5A:OSB:4.0 W:O'Neil/Griffin010172247365
6A:LS:McAuliffe010172148388
7A:RH:Rockettes:Baron/Baron010122451397
8B:TC:Play it Forward:Sookvaree/Stasko010162456396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Andrea Frickman
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.75
Claire Steppan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Colleen Kluberdanz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Suzanne Ellery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Kristen Onorato
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.64
Stephanie Marchand
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.60
Amy Dirico
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dana Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.21
Amy Searle
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Steverman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.10
Jessica Cote
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jessica Kirwan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Kate Buteau
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Kate Welch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sky Hoyt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Buteau + Andrea Frickman6164% games+10.3% vs expected
Dana Johnson + Claire Steppan15363% games+10.0% vs expected
Claire Steppan + Andrea Frickman10648% games+2.1% vs expected
Andrea Frickman + Kristen Onorato141648% games−2.4% vs expected
Suzanne Ellery + Amy Dirico2346% games−5.5% vs expected
Claire Steppan + Kristen Onorato8848% games−7.0% vs expected
Colleen Kluberdanz + Kristen Onorato404 matchesnot enough data
Dana Johnson + Amy Searle314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Frickman
114W–61L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Claire Steppan
115W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Colleen Kluberdanz
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Ellery
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Kristen Onorato
71W–63L career · 7 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Stephanie Marchand
47W–66L career · 9 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Amy Dirico
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Dana Johnson
59W–24L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Amy Searle
83W–108L career · 11 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Sarah Steverman
30W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Jessica Cote
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Jessica Kirwan
48W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Buteau
17W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Welch
21W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sky Hoyt
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.