Teams

SFV LLW - Club Osa MXD - Raquel Andal

2024 Mixed Tri-Level 18+ SFV Fall · SFV High Tri-Level Mixed 3.5-4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.19 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-17vs SFV - AV Stormers Mx-TriWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharmaine Felix-Meyer / Jonathan Talbot vs Carlos Guarin / Ani Aratounians4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-11-16vs SFV - Fuzz Off Mx-TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesQuoc Ly / Stella Ko vs Eduardo Cedeno / April Hartstein3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-19vs SFV - Fuzz Off Mx-TriLost 01
L#3 DoublesSaeed Saed / Stella Ko vs Eduardo Cedeno / Sandy Brathwaite7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-14vs SFV - Fuzz Off Mx-TriLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharmaine Felix-Meyer / Jonathan Talbot vs Sandy Brathwaite / Alain Banas3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV High Tri-Level Mixed 3.5-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Chandler Nguyen
published 4.5
4.21
Leonardo Kim
published
4.19
Stella Ko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Giancarlo Bertumen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.16
Julie Flygare
published
4.15
Jason Nam
published
4.12
Saeed Saed
published
4.00
3.97
Jing Lin
published
3.85
Jaime Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Jonathan Talbot
published
3.82
Sara Heum
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Raizzi Rodriguez
published 4
3.67
Charmaine Felix-Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Stephen Kim
published
Rocio Ibarra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charmaine Felix-Meyer + Jonathan Talbot033 matchesnot enough data
Sara Heum + Jaime Tovar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandler Nguyen
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.40
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Stella Ko
85W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Giancarlo Bertumen
129W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.16
Julie Flygare
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.16
Jason Nam
23W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
4.15
Saeed Saed
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Dastan Mazhetayev
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
4.00
Jing Lin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Jaime Tovar
125W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jonathan Talbot
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Sara Heum
122W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Raizzi Rodriguez
94W–70L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Charmaine Felix-Meyer
118W–128L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Stephen Kim
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Rocio Ibarra
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.