Teams

LATA18/KWescott/LCTC

Combo 18 & Over · Women 9.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-28vs LLAS UPTA18C/FenigerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Polk / Carlynn Musil vs Liza Feniger / Jennifer Milne6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Holland / Laura Plyler vs Julianne Foster / Michele Jain4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Moore / Kristin Estes vs Carol Hayduk / Rhonda Watson6-0, 6-2
2024-10-28vs LCTA18/Jain/IndependantLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Moore / Lisa Barrett vs Madison Cook / Chelsea Boehme4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Walter / Kristin Estes vs Tabatha Butler / Samantha Sullivan6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTeri Grote / Meghan Polk vs Mary-Wallace DeBerry / Teodora Doncheva4-6, 1-1
2024-10-27vs HHTL18/Bailey/ChaplinLost 03
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Moore / Elizabeth Holland vs Katie Ruth / Carolina Lainez3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Polk / Staci Jackson vs Rebecca Richison / Kristen Finlen4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Walter / Kristin Estes vs Dziyana Nazaruk / Dale Cross6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-26vs LCTA18/Richey/CTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesStaci Jackson / Meghan Polk vs Samantha Schuster / Jordan Bowers6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadeleine Moore / Elizabeth Holland vs Tessa Radziej / Katie Richey6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrooke Walter / Kristin Estes vs Kathy Hughes / Christian Fleming6-2, 6-1
2024-10-26vs LCTA18/Kryder/IndependentWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Barrett / Madeleine Moore vs Haley Powell / HELEN BENNETT6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Walter / Kristin Estes vs Nancy O'Dell-Keim / Ann Harrah5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Polk / Staci Jackson vs Anna Yates / Martha Lee6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brooke Walter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.72
Renee Leacock
published
4.58
Caroline Holland
published 5
4.34
Laura Plyler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Carlynn Musil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Meghan Polk
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.25
Madeleine Moore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.23
Teri Grote
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Kristin Estes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.94
Staci Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Grote + Carlynn Musil5353% games−4.3% vs expected
Brooke Walter + Kristin Estes5165% gamesnot enough data
Staci Jackson + Meghan Polk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brooke Walter
13W–2L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Leacock
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.72
5
Caroline Holland
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.58
Laura Plyler
48W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Carlynn Musil
30W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%10%
4.33
Meghan Polk
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
4.27
Madeleine Moore
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
Teri Grote
42W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Kristin Estes
26W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
4.19
Staci Jackson
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.