Teams

ALMADEN SR CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-17vs LOS GATOS SR CW6.5BWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Anderson / Julie Mills vs Lauren Denevi / Lauren Kutting4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Kent / Theresa Opp vs Lorraine Mc Carthy / Lisa Baumert7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Cesario / Lisa Szabo vs Amanda Holmquist / Joan Culin6-1, 6-2
2025-08-27vs WALLENBERG PK CW6.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Pisani / Terry Huang vs Yemia Hashimoto / Dan Su1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHeather Kent / Lisa Szabo vs Mimi Fichter / Mhavz Malado0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKRISTEN SAXON / Shelley Goglio vs Ying Zhang / Xuan Wei2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Julie Boncher
published
3.48
Melynda Davenport
published
3.47
3.44
Catherine Caouette
published 3.5
3.34
Heather Kent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Janice Passarello
published
3.32
KRISTEN SAXON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Lisa Cesario
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Amanda Kuoy
published 3.5
3.24
Rebecca McCarthy
published
3.24
Jill Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Julia Scott
published
3.15
Terry Huang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Kristen Pisani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Theresa Opp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Julie Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Lisa Szabo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Shelley Goglio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Gwen Tran
published
2.59
Kim Bespaly
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Ellen Abate
published
2.53
Patricia Duong
published
Monique Vandenberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca McCarthy + Lisa Cesario5073% games+12.4% vs expected
Lisa Szabo + Shelley Goglio4260% games+5.7% vs expected
Julie Boncher + Janice Passarello4260% games+0.7% vs expected
Laurie Christian-Neff + Jill Anderson2355% games−0.4% vs expected
Janice Passarello + Lisa Cesario5352% games−1.0% vs expected
Julie Boncher + Laurie Christian-Neff314 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Caouette + Melynda Davenport314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Boncher + Lisa Cesario213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Boncher
31W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Melynda Davenport
38W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Laurie Christian-Neff
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Catherine Caouette
33W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Heather Kent
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Janice Passarello
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
KRISTEN SAXON
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Cesario
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Amanda Kuoy
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Rebecca McCarthy
21W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jill Anderson
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Julia Scott
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Terry Huang
23W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Kristen Pisani
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.13
Theresa Opp
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Julie Mills
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Lisa Szabo
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.81
Shelley Goglio
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Gwen Tran
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
Kim Bespaly
28W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Ellen Abate
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Patricia Duong
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Monique Vandenberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.