Teams

SFV - Simply Smashing 3.5

2024 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-22vs SFV - Hot ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bevan / Margie Englis vs Kristin Farrand / Angela Martinez-Lee6-2, 6-2
2024-11-24vs SFV - Paseo TribeWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie Englis / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Deidre Hope / Cheryl Morrow7-6, 6-2
2024-11-17vs SFV - BabeolatsWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Scott / Margie Englis vs Mina Yang / Patricia Fernandez6-1, 6-3
2024-11-10vs SFV - Chicks With Sticks 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMargie Englis / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Leslie Giammanco / Sara Giammanco3-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs SFV - Dream TeamWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Anna Noveck / Margie Englis vs Monica Kaplan / Janine Baker6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Christy Weissman
published 3.5
3.01
Mary Anna Noveck
published
2.91
Andrea Fruits
published 3
2.88
Norma Jean
published
2.83
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
ANALILY PARK
published 3
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.60
Vanessa Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stella Dumlao-Idea + Margie Englis5351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Mikaelian
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Christy Weissman
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Mary Anna Noveck
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Andrea Fruits
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Norma Jean
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
ANALILY PARK
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.