Teams

Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.5 40 & Over Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-12vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Parker / Ryan Ingram vs Brooks Jackson / Michael Auger4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Davis / Kenny Winter vs Chris Chapman / Aaron Anderson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrad Johnson / Eric Anthony vs Bryan Vescio / Ziad Fleihan6-7, 3-6
2026-05-05vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Parker / Jay Hitchcock vs Bryan Vescio / Neil Henderson6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Keaney / Ryan Ingram vs Brian Johnson / Michael Shade6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Anthony / Lee Picklesimer vs Steven Denning / Charlie Lambis6-4, 6-3
2026-04-28vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Hitchcock / Stephen Keaney vs Bryan Vescio / Neil Henderson1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJason Burr / Kenny Winter vs Ziad Fleihan / Andy Rutledge6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLee Picklesimer / Ryan Ingram vs Jeff Fusaiotti / Aaron Anderson2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-04-21vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesKenny Winter / Michael Parker vs Bryan Vescio / Chris Chapman7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilson Paine / Brad Johnson vs Brian Johnson / William Feehan1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChuck Burns / Stephen Keaney vs Neil Henderson / Michael Auger1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-14vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Davis / David Leatherwood vs Bryan Vescio / Chris Chapman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJason Burr / Michael Parker vs Michael Shade / Jeff Fusaiotti6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilson Paine / Brad Johnson vs Steven Denning / Neil Henderson6-7, 3-6
2026-04-07vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Davis / Eric Anthony vs Bryan Vescio / Brooks Jackson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Burr / Michael Parker vs Steven Denning / Charlie Lambis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Ingram / Jay Hitchcock vs Charles Calkins / Andy Rutledge7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-31vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilson Paine / Kenny Winter vs Bryan Vescio / Michael Shade2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Burns / Lee Picklesimer vs Andy Rutledge / Brian Johnson3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Ingram / Stephen Keaney vs Charlie Lambis / Aaron Anderson6-3, 6-1
2026-03-24vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Davis / Kenny Winter vs Steven Denning / Brooks Jackson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Lapierre / Ryan Ingram vs Andy Rutledge / Michael Shade3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJay Hitchcock / Michael Parker vs William Feehan / Neil Henderson7-5, 6-3
2026-03-21vs Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephen Keaney / Jay Hitchcock vs Raymond Rosario / Ziad Fleihan6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJason Burr / Scott Dean vs Charles Calkins / Jeff Fusaiotti6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Johnson / David Leatherwood vs Steven Denning / Charlie Lambis1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MEN 4.5 40 & Over Tues PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rosario 40s 4.5M Tues PM63141330253
2Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM36131433262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Scott Dean
published
4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.23
Jason Burr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Eric Anthony
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Ryan Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Lee Picklesimer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.18
Jay Hitchcock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.17
David Leatherwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Kenny Winter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.05
Stephen Keaney
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.02
Wilson Paine
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Lapierre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenny Winter + Jay Hitchcock314 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Keaney + Jay Hitchcock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Dean
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.81
4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
Jason Burr
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Eric Anthony
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Ingram
3W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.21
Lee Picklesimer
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Jay Hitchcock
19W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
David Leatherwood
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Kenny Winter
41W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.17
Stephen Keaney
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
Wilson Paine
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Mark Lapierre
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.