Teams

NITA E 70W55e Naperville (Bianchi)

2024 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 7.0 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesGail Kennedy / Minami Powell vs Becky Smith / Maida Korte6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Harper / Sarah W Johnson vs Teri Berger / Nancy Sherman4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLarisa Adamian / Zaneta Gintautas vs Kay Noonan / Sue Clarkson6-3, 6-0
2023-12-16vs NITA E 70W55d Courts Plus (Bursch)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Tomoko Hayashida vs Pam Kuchan / Wendy Leto6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Engle / Lesa Moskowitz vs Judy Harris / Janet Trimble1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLarisa Adamian / Zaneta Gintautas vs Marisa Mancini / Julie Roth2-6, 1-6
2023-12-09vs NITA E 70W55f Challenge (Sharp)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRose Northon / Dorothy OMalley vs Cathy Abbott / Peggy Schwerman6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMargaret McAndrews / Lesa Moskowitz vs Becky Sharp / Diedre Castaldo0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy MacDonald / Minami Powell vs Linda Kennedy / Tina Cunningham6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesGail Kennedy / Dorothy OMalley vs Christine Lee / Debbie Abunassar7-6, 5-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Batka / Lori Vardas vs Salve Messina / Mary McNamara6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCynthia McCarthy / Maureen Henderson vs Anne Ruden / Marjorie Bogdalek5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-11vs NITA E 70W55a Rush Copley (Adams)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Cynthia McCarthy vs Mary Baker / Audrey Geannopoulos6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTomoko Hayashida / Cindy MacDonald vs Nancy Williford / Diane Fonte6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Harper / Jean Palasz vs Janet Juarez / Gail Wolf2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Jane Strien vs Anne Ruden / Judy Wagner7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Batka / Lori Vardas vs Tracy Reese / Elizabeth Sheridan7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGail Kennedy / Cynthia McCarthy vs Julie Burke-Concannon / Salve Messina6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAmy Harper / Dorothy OMalley vs Jeanine Janzen / Vilia Dedinas6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatherine Bianchi / Jane Strien vs Francine Holmes / Colette Pinter6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSarah W Johnson / Jean Palasz vs Kim Bakievski / Julie Roth6-7, 3-5
W#1 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Jane Strien vs Leslie Barrows / Anna Marie Mastro6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Batka / Lori Vardas vs Sara Fortier / Nancy Sherman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Harper / Margaret McAndrews vs Sue Clarkson / Maida Korte6-2, 6-2
2023-10-06vs NITA E 70W55a Rush Copley (Adams)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Cindy MacDonald vs Meijan Linda Yu / Nancy Williford6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGail Kennedy / Dorothy OMalley vs Gail Wolf / Diane Fonte6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRose Northon / Jane Strien vs Lisa Korte / Janet Juarez6-2, 6-4
2023-09-24vs NITA E 70W55f Challenge (Sharp)Won 30
W#1 DoublesGail Kennedy / Dorothy OMalley vs Becky Sharp / Diedre Castaldo6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Jane Strien vs Cathy Abbott / Peggy Schwerman6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Engle / Amy Harper vs Tina Cunningham / Helen Micchelli6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA ESL 55 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 70W55e Naperville (Bianchi)9124616212
2NITA E 70W55c Naperville (Sheridan/Ruden)82191126219
3NITA E 70W55d Courts Plus (Bursch)64191124213
4NITA E 70W55f Challenge (Sharp)46121841298
5NITA E 70W55a Rush Copley (Adams)37121840273
6NITA E 70W55b Norris (Sherman/Jirsa)01042653327

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Cindy MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Dorothy OMalley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.36
Jane Strien
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Margaret McAndrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Lesa Moskowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Marie Hajduk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Cynthia McCarthy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amy Harper
published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Cheryl Engle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Zaneta Gintautas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Gail Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Lori Vardas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Tomoko Hayashida
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Larisa Adamian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Sarah W Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Palasz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Minami Powell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rose Northon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Northon + Marie Hajduk4262% games+11.8% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Jane Strien19073% games+9.9% vs expected
Margaret McAndrews + Marie Hajduk5265% games+9.8% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Zaneta Gintautas11364% games+6.2% vs expected
Margaret McAndrews + Lesa Moskowitz8454% games+5.6% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Zaneta Gintautas7659% games+5.0% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Lesa Moskowitz2446% games+3.4% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Gail Kennedy8258% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Cindy MacDonald
74W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Jane Strien
154W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Margaret McAndrews
72W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Lesa Moskowitz
134W–118L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Marie Hajduk
130W–86L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia McCarthy
76W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Harper
44W–60L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Henderson
101W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Engle
93W–116L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Zaneta Gintautas
141W–122L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Gail Kennedy
50W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Lori Vardas
164W–120L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tomoko Hayashida
116W–176L career · 2 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Larisa Adamian
146W–108L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.02
Sarah W Johnson
86W–127L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Katherine Bianchi
66W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Jean Palasz
21W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Minami Powell
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rose Northon
26W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.