Teams

SILVER CREEK 18AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-07vs RINCONADA PK 18AW3.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudy Taylor / Melanie Sendek vs Jeanette Dayan / Patrizia Fazeli6-2, 6-4
2022-06-12vs ALMADEN VAC 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJudy Taylor / Angela Robbiano vs Lori Ruiz / Wendy Penunuri0-6, 2-6
2022-06-11vs LOS GATOS SR 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLise Fox / Judy Taylor vs Essie Asher / Debbie Ryan3-6, 3-6
2022-06-07vs RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Taylor / Elaine Chiu vs Rachel Banse / Rose Madriaga4-6, 3-6
2022-06-02vs ALMADEN VAC 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudy Taylor / Melanie Sendek vs Michelle Rotzin / Jeanine Smith6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-22vs RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Viarengo / Judy Taylor vs Noreen Kakalec / Laura Schenkelberg6-4, 6-4
2022-05-04vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesErna Nishime / Judy Taylor vs May Topper / Hang O'Neill6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesDeborah Hao / Judy Taylor vs Jenner Crema / Margaret Gally6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-28vs RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMaryam Malekian / Judy Taylor vs Rachel Banse / Rose Madriaga2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Maria Cross
published
3.54
Melanie Sendek
published
3.37
Pari Pham
published
3.37
Stacie Pittenger
published
3.29
Nitika Korla
published
3.28
Michelle Ney
published
3.26
Laura Viarengo
published
3.25
Maryam Malekian
published
Catherine Plaia
published 3.5
3.23
Jett Koketsu
published
3.23
Deborah Hao
published 3.5
3.21
Nelli Dijkhuizen
published
3.10
JULIE PHAM
published 3.5
3.10
Erna Nishime
published 3.5
3.06
Martha Jepsky
published
2.99
Elaine Chiu
published 3.5
Judy Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Stanziale
published
Lise Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Pittenger + Pari Pham3347% games+2.3% vs expected
Erna Nishime + Stacie Pittenger123 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Pittenger + Nelli Dijkhuizen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Cross
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Melanie Sendek
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Pari Pham
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Stacie Pittenger
15W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Nitika Korla
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Michelle Ney
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
Laura Viarengo
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Maryam Malekian
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Catherine Plaia
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jett Koketsu
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Deborah Hao
10W–25L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Nelli Dijkhuizen
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
JULIE PHAM
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Erna Nishime
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Martha Jepsky
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Elaine Chiu
8W–23L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Judy Taylor
37W–35L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Stanziale
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lise Fox
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.