Teams

Walker/18s/3.0/PAC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Englert/18s/3.0/SC9125513161
2Guma/18s/3.0/BC9122819204
3Walker/18s/3.0/PAC82201022237
4Caswell/18s/3.0/NC7321920202
5Parvizian/18/3.0/SC7322821224
6Millers/18s/3.0/FAC55151534264
7Ortis/18s/3.0/PAC46121837284
8Faucheux/18s/3.0/BC28111940295
9Faught/18s/3.0/TCH2862449311
10Guillet/18s/3.0/COQ1952550319
11Schulzes/18s/3.0/NC1962451313

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Brooke Brown
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Boushie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
3.17
Ethan Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Amy St. Romain
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.71
Evan Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Jason Catt
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Jay St. Romain
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Joelle Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Landon Brown
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Boushie + Jason Catt7066% gamesnot enough data
Joelle Cuevas + Jay St. Romain303 matchesnot enough data
Amy St. Romain + Jay St. Romain213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Brown
28W–6L career · 14 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Ann Boushie
52W–22L career · 38 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.17
3.5
Ethan Hunt
16W–4L career · type D · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Amy St. Romain
16W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Evan Bailey
10W–11L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Jason Catt
38W–17L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay St. Romain
14W–3L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joelle Cuevas
34W–34L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Brown
10W–13L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Lucas
17W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.