Teams

KY/LEX/BANTZ

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-28vs KY/LEX/Ingram (non-play cptn)Won 41
W#1 DoublesJoey Mckinney / Zach Young vs Ravi Raithatha / Stephen Schwab6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesShawn Savage vs Nicholas Annichiarico4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrooks Harrison / Eugene Matthew Almazan vs Alberto Rondon / Jordan Yeiser6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChase Wooley vs Brandon Shetler6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBenny Evans / Joe Ross vs Abram Sadr / Yohan Herman6-1, 6-2
2025-05-13vs KY/LEX/Ingram (non-play cptn)Won 50
W#1 DoublesEugene Matthew Almazan / Zach Young vs Headley Butler / Jordan Yeiser6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSantiago Bravo vs Brandon Shetler6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShawn Savage / Josh Franklin vs Alberto Rondon / Andre Stock6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAdam Bantz vs Ravi Raithatha6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrooks Harrison / Joe Ross vs Jon Terry / Stephen Schwab6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Shawn Savage
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.88
Eugene Matthew Almazan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Adam Bantz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Santiago Bravo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.79
Zach Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.79
Brooks Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.75
3.65
Benny Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Joey Mckinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Chase Wooley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Josh Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Joe Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Nick Bantz
published
Felix Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benny Evans + Joe Ross314 matchesnot enough data
Adam Bantz + Zach Young134 matchesnot enough data
Zach Young + Joey Mckinney314 matchesnot enough data
Benny Evans + Joey Mckinney303 matchesnot enough data
Eugene Matthew Almazan + Christopher Anderson123 matchesnot enough data
Eugene Matthew Almazan + Zach Young303 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Anderson + Zach Young303 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Savage + Zach Young213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn Savage
30W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
Eugene Matthew Almazan
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Adam Bantz
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Santiago Bravo
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Zach Young
36W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Brooks Harrison
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
4
Christopher Anderson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Benny Evans
21W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Joey Mckinney
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Chase Wooley
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Josh Franklin
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Joe Ross
41W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Nick Bantz
39W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Felix Lam
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.