Teams

BC-PVTC/IrenePailet(formerlyNance)

2025 MIXED 55 & OVER I - BC LOCAL LEAGUE · BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-30vs BC-LLWS-WestEnd/MaryKayDyesWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Guggenheim / Stephen Miller vs Sungsoon Han / Jaeyong Han6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeffery Kam / Jane Mehra vs Mary Kay Dyes / Steve Hulbert6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-16vs BC-SealBeachTC/YolandaBarocioLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Marcure / Karen Kredel vs Mark Mihalco / Sue Magnall3-6, 1-6
2025-03-01vs BC-AltaVista/RuedeemardOdanakaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Lee / Jeffery Kam vs Thomas Browne / Lorna Kim6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-22vs BC-AltaVista/TeresaCampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffery Kam / Galena Miller-Horii vs Mike Vaughn / Suzy Nyhus6-2, 6-3
2025-01-18vs BC-AltaVista/RuedeemardOdanakaLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Guggenheim / Stephen Miller vs Ruedeemard Odanaka / Nigel Witham3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-12vs BC-AltaVista/TeresaCampbellLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Guggenheim / Jeffery Kam vs Brent Blackman / Anne Hirata6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Kurt Kredel
published
3.88
Jon Paul Javellana
published
3.87
Stephanie Guggenheim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
3.83
Eileen Kaiser
published 4
3.69
3.68
Karen Kredel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Jeffery Kam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.60
Matthew Luce
published
3.42
Teena Wapner
published
3.37
Jane Mehra
published
3.11
Jonathan Lane
published
Jeffrey Wahba
published
Nikki Nance
published
Robert Stearns
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kurt Kredel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Jon Paul Javellana
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Stephanie Guggenheim
67W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Galena Miller-Horii
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Eileen Kaiser
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Elizabeth Alexander
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Karen Kredel
42W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Jeffery Kam
148W–117L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Matthew Luce
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Teena Wapner
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jane Mehra
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jonathan Lane
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Jeffrey Wahba
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Nance
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Stearns
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.