Teams

NEWC/Harley/65&Over7.0M

2023 Neb. Adult 65&Over · 7.0 Adult Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-02vs NE/Winquest/65&Over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesRoderick Harley / Robert Roth vs Jeffrey Konen / Ronn Winquest4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Crook / Jean Uffelman vs Roger Penland / Greg Allen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Bauersfeld / Steve Breit vs Glenn Thomson / Mike Gardner4-6, 3-6
2023-05-18vs NE/Winquest/65&Over7.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Roth / Jim Bauersfeld vs Glenn Thomson / Ronn Winquest4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHarold Tu / Steve Breit vs Craig Hendricks / Jeffrey Konen2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-11vs NE/Winquest/65&Over7.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesHarold Tu / James Pigg vs Ronn Winquest / Robert Queen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Crook / Richard Strange vs Glenn Thomson / Mike Gardner5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJim Bauersfeld / Roderick Harley vs Greg Allen / Roger Penland6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Robert Roth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Jim Bauersfeld
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Harold Tu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
James Pigg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Richard Strange
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Uffelman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Crook
published
Steve Breit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Bauersfeld + James Pigg2543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Roth
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.38
Jim Bauersfeld
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Harold Tu
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
James Pigg
41W–57L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.18
Richard Strange
18W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
Jean Uffelman
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
John Crook
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Breit
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.