Teams

CDTA S ComboW6.5 2.Wilm Tromp Sat 9 $20

1Summer Combo WN · WE

17 players · average NTRP 3.31 / CHICAGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesRosemary Swierk / Natalie Kroft vs Sydney Zusman / Christina Greeley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Katie Gillig vs Lynn Meyer / Stephanie Rosenberg5-7, 5-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Goldberg / Janet Mital vs Julie Gordon / Tricia Lewis6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelli Brinkman / Natalie Kroft vs Julie Bell / Chris Nelson6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Simone Brown vs Elisa Zusman / Aimee Hombach7-6, 5-3
W#1 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Christie Jordan vs Nicole Leavitt / Michelle Nacheman6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJessica Gross / Jessica Franke vs Kajal Sangal / Neli Alexieva5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Kasiurak / Simone Brown vs Haina Shin / Naoka Shin6-7, 4-3, 1-0
2026-06-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRosemary Swierk / Natalie Kroft vs Gabrielle Armstrong / Susan Ellison6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJessica Gross / Jessica Franke vs Martha Billen / Selma Bouhl6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S ComboW6.5 2.Wilm Tromp Sat 9 $207015615163
2CDTA S ComboW6.5 1.RT Cox Sun 2 $2744141026212
3CDTA S ComboW6.5 4.RCLB Sherman Thu 6:30 $2244131127219
4CDTA S ComboW6.5 5.MTB(OUT) Zusman Sat 10 $292581327170
5CDTA S ComboW6.5 3.Nbk Shin Sat 10 $282671736247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Claudine Seidel
published 3.5
3.41
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.39
Jessica Gross
published 3.5
3.31
Rosemary Swierk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.25
Christi Harrison
published 3.5
3.24
Kelli Brinkman
published 3.5
3.19
Jeanne Whisler
published 3.5
3.08
Lelia Lanuza
published 3
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
2.97
Janet Mital
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Nora Jewett
published 3
2.89
Simone Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Beth Goldberg
published 3
Jessica Franke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Kroft
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lelia Lanuza + Simone Brown6080% games+18.2% vs expected
Christi Harrison + Michelle Yeh3453% games+8.7% vs expected
Lelia Lanuza + Christie Jordan10264% games+6.9% vs expected
Christi Harrison + Jeanne Tromp3548% games+5.5% vs expected
Jeanne Whisler + Rosemary Swierk3356% games+3.8% vs expected
Kelli Brinkman + Nora Jewett8362% games+2.5% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Kelli Brinkman6756% games+2.0% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Jeanne Tromp5260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudine Seidel
43W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Jessica Gross
74W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Rosemary Swierk
70W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Christi Harrison
54W–48L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Kelli Brinkman
45W–18L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jeanne Whisler
26W–13L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Lelia Lanuza
32W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Janet Mital
40W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Nora Jewett
37W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Simone Brown
44W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Beth Goldberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Franke
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalie Kroft
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.