Teams

LCTA54/Adler/MPR

LCTA 54 & Over Fall League · 54 & over - Women 3.5 Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 54 & over - Women 3.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Regina Hallman
published
3.34
Mary Cecil
published
3.32
Olga Haefele
published
3.23
Sylvia Delsalto
published
3.21
Dianne Newton
published 3.5
3.20
Manon Mosher
published
3.17
Rebecca Adler
published
3.16
Janet Winch
published
3.14
Roberta Browning
published
3.12
Diane Rozier
published 3.5
2.99
Andrea Harrison
published 3.5
2.96
Neda Smith
published
2.79
Paige Kuehmeier
published
2.77
Gretchen Looney
published 3
2.57
Karen Marks
published
Mercedes Logan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvia Delsalto + Rebecca Adler15359% games+8.8% vs expected
Olga Haefele + Manon Mosher7262% games+8.2% vs expected
Olga Haefele + Rebecca Adler4160% games+3.2% vs expected
Sylvia Delsalto + Regina Hallman5350% games−4.2% vs expected
Mary Cecil + Regina Hallman5350% games−6.9% vs expected
Manon Mosher + Rebecca Adler3642% games−8.5% vs expected
Mary Cecil + Rebecca Adler314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Cecil + Andrea Harrison033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Regina Hallman
46W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Mary Cecil
39W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Olga Haefele
42W–33L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Sylvia Delsalto
88W–72L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dianne Newton
28W–21L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Manon Mosher
31W–52L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Rebecca Adler
51W–42L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.17
Janet Winch
55W–58L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.16
Roberta Browning
17W–33L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Diane Rozier
23W–44L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andrea Harrison
33W–81L career · type A · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Neda Smith
86W–81L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
Paige Kuehmeier
17W–35L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Gretchen Looney
45W–53L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Karen Marks
27W–40L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
Mercedes Logan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.