Teams

Burnstein/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-06vs Falk/Brooks/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny West D'Alba / Kates Snyder vs Carol Jones / Scotty Falk2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Baas vs Charlotte Wolfe6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWhitney Conyers / Misty Holladay vs Tara Reidy / Katie Woodcock2-6, 4-6
2024-10-30vs Baumgartner/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesKates Snyder / Jenny West D'Alba vs Maggie Kuyper / Mary Powers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanny McClure / Briana Mullenax vs Charlene Marcum / Mindy Higgins6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Briana Mullenax
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Stephanie Baas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.60
Melissa von Wald
published
3.58
Julie Burnstein
published
3.56
Janny McClure
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Whitney Conyers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Misty Holladay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Poonam Kabaria
published
3.39
Annie Adler
published 3.5
3.37
Jenny West D'Alba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Maryam Khan
published
3.19
3.19
Virginia Mazzoni
published
Katherine Cigarran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Mullenax + Janny McClure5065% games+15.4% vs expected
Briana Mullenax + Whitney Conyers11362% games+14.6% vs expected
Maryam Khan + Poonam Kabaria6261% games+4.0% vs expected
Julie Burnstein + Whitney Conyers5453% games+1.9% vs expected
Julie Burnstein + Briana Mullenax3453% games−2.5% vs expected
Annie Adler + Misty Holladay3259% gamesnot enough data
Annie Adler + Virginia Mazzoni303 matchesnot enough data
Misty Holladay + Briana Mullenax303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Briana Mullenax
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Stephanie Baas
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Melissa von Wald
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Julie Burnstein
33W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Janny McClure
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Whitney Conyers
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Misty Holladay
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Poonam Kabaria
26W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Annie Adler
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jenny West D'Alba
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Maryam Khan
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Mary Margaret Behncke
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Virginia Mazzoni
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Katherine Cigarran
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.