Teams

KMacrone (Park Road)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-02vs VWooten (Hornets Nest)Won 20
W#1 DoublesElaine Eisenbaum / Mandy Occhipinti vs Alaina Altamura / Laura Dragon1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Letorney / Kate MacRone vs Virginia Wooten / Claudia Margaroli6-4, 6-2
2024-04-25vs MBurns (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 SinglesZahide Marenic vs Doga Karyaldiz6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Heidy Bartell vs Helen Odom / Meghana Yechuri6-2, 6-1
2024-04-24vs TMagee/Diman (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Mandy Occhipinti vs Tricia Magee / Katie Wagner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKate MacRone vs Bailee Collins4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesZahide Marenic / Jan Albright vs Sarah Miller / Anne McCurry6-2, 6-4
2024-04-18vs AMinish (Life Time)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMandy Occhipinti / Kathy Lucas vs Julie Dailly / Kristen FitzGerald5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPeggy Reimann vs Leidys Pinzon6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesZahide Marenic vs Kristina Cancian2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Silvia / Jan Albright vs Jackie Gyoerkoe / Lisa Darfler1-6, 3-6
2024-04-04vs JHamlin (Hornets Nest)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMandy Occhipinti / Kathy Lucas vs Madison Lee / Allie Doub7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Zahide Marenic vs Emilia Anderson / Lindsay Lillibridge6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Davis / Sherri Silvia vs Jennifer Hamlin / Marissa Martin6-2, 6-3
2024-03-21vs YSmith (CFB)Won 21
W#1 DoublesConnie Arevalo / Kathy Lucas vs Carolyn Henderson / Christine Zetts6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Letorney / Sherri Silvia vs Melissa Smith / Sylvia Holper2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKate MacRone vs Kelly DiCristo6-2, 6-3
2024-03-07vs RAddison (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Connie Arevalo vs Catherine Tharp / Anna Margaret Hutchins6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMandy Occhipinti vs Mary Brauer0-6, 0-6
2024-02-22vs KLee/SChandra (CTNC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Connie Arevalo vs Vicki Greenway / Lauren Olson7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesZahide Marenic vs Mayela Magur5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Mandy Occhipinti vs Sarah Varner / Jodi VonEschen6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Connie Arevalo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.14
Brooke Kline
published 3.5
3.10
Peggy Reimann
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.04
Mary Gross
published
3.00
Zahide Marenic
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Kathy Lucas
published
2.89
Elaine Eisenbaum
published
2.83
Kate MacRone
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.78
Mandy Occhipinti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.71
Barbara Davis
published 3
2.57
Sherri Silvia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Carrie Letorney
published 3
2.41
Jan Albright
published
2.34
Heidy Bartell
published
Tatiana Kotsulim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate MacRone + Connie Arevalo5259% games+5.7% vs expected
Peggy Reimann + Connie Arevalo7260% games+5.6% vs expected
Connie Arevalo + Zahide Marenic8071% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Reimann + Kathy Lucas224 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Reimann + Zahide Marenic314 matchesnot enough data
Kate MacRone + Mandy Occhipinti213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Lucas + Zahide Marenic213 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Occhipinti + Connie Arevalo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Arevalo
88W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Brooke Kline
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Peggy Reimann
100W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.10
Mary Gross
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Zahide Marenic
56W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Kathy Lucas
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Elaine Eisenbaum
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Kate MacRone
76W–122L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Mandy Occhipinti
24W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Barbara Davis
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Sherri Silvia
16W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Carrie Letorney
15W–29L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jan Albright
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%75%25%
2.41
Heidy Bartell
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34
Tatiana Kotsulim
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.