Teams

KY/LEX/Ingram

2025 USTA WINTER FUN LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Men 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-28vs KY/LEX/Lauder/WilfordLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Ruh / Dustin Ingram vs J Peter Cassidy / David Ferretti0-6, 6-7
2025-02-06vs KY/LEX/Fox 18+ 3-0 Winter FUNWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeromie Russell / Enoch Carlstrom vs Jordan Bell / Patrick Orr6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJared Jeffers vs Asher Bowe6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrent Moulton / Drake Moulton vs Mike Bensing / Tim Rose6-4, 7-5
2025-01-27vs KY/LEX/Fox 18+ 3-0 Winter FUNLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeromie Russell / Drake Moulton vs Asher Bowe / Demetrios Karathanasis6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDaniel Bartlett vs James Aguilar1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrent Moulton / Josh Lingreen vs Shyen Shah / Jordan Bell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Jay Swacker
published
3.02
Jeromie Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Drake Moulton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Dustin Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Enoch Carlstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Brent Moulton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Josh Lingreen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Daniel Bartlett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Carson Hunt
published 2.5
Jared Jeffers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dustin Ingram + Enoch Carlstrom7062% games+4.3% vs expected
Brent Moulton + Drake Moulton404 matchesnot enough data
Drake Moulton + Josh Lingreen224 matchesnot enough data
Brent Moulton + Dustin Ingram213 matchesnot enough data
Jay Swacker + Jeromie Russell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Swacker
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jeromie Russell
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Drake Moulton
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Dustin Ingram
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Enoch Carlstrom
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Brent Moulton
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Josh Lingreen
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Daniel Bartlett
4W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Carson Hunt
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Jeffers
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.