Teams

Sharkasm

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-10vs WhaquedLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Agler / Nancy Raeber vs Christal Petrak / Dottie Belitsos1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-06-08vs Deja DeuceWon 10
W#3 DoublesBetsy McDonald / Lisa Gardner vs Heidi Hawkins / Molly Henrie6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-03vs Supreme CourtWon 20
W#2 DoublesSheila Bush / Nancy Raeber vs JoLyn Janecko / Maureen Sykes4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrista Napier / Betsy McDonald vs Jen Hunter / Kristen Pentz-Weitz3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Tanya Vaughan
published 4
3.43
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Strong
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.26
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
published 3.5
3.25
Betsy McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Cynthia Copple
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Johnson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.10
Lori Hosac
published 3.5
3.06
Emily Allen
published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Wilson
published
2.95
Kim Agler
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
Nancy Raeber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Bush
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wilson + Stephanie Churchman5356% games+11.2% vs expected
Lori Hosac + Stephanie Churchman11359% games+9.4% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Emily Allen121253% games+8.5% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Molly Schafer1742% games+4.8% vs expected
Stacey Strong + Emily Allen292854% games+2.9% vs expected
Tanya Vaughan + Jennifer Wilson2643% games+0.5% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Jennifer Wilson3444% games−0.7% vs expected
Rebecca Fitzpatrick + Stephanie Churchman141254% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanya Vaughan
148W–143L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Stacey Strong
64W–62L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Rebecca Fitzpatrick
97W–114L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Betsy McDonald
75W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia Copple
74W–96L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Johnson
58W–96L career · 8 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lori Hosac
101W–89L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Emily Allen
82W–69L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Kim Agler
89W–82L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
Nancy Raeber
46W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sheila Bush
14W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.