Teams

KY/LEX/Ingram

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-28vs KY/LEX/Dang/MuniswamyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Jude / Drake Moulton vs Mandeep Saini / Lucas Meadors6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEnoch Carlstrom / Dustin Ingram vs Sandeep Dambla / Saurabh Parasramka6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJordan Gieselman / Brent Moulton vs Sanjay Dwarakanath / Sumit Dang4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-03vs KY/LEX/Dang/MuniswamyWon 31
W#1 DoublesGuston Thomas / Anthony Strode vs Ronak Jani / Vinod Muniswamy6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Jude / Enoch Carlstrom vs Sanjay Dwarakanath / Jeff Bramble6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesJordan Gieselman vs Mandeep Saini5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDrake Moulton / Brent Moulton vs Saurabh Parasramka / Lucas Meadors6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Neal Manor
published
3.26
Jay Swacker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Isaac Meisner
published
3.18
Jordan Gieselman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Guston Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jeromie Russell
published
3.02
Drake Moulton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Dustin Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Enoch Carlstrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Brent Moulton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Josh Lingreen
published
2.66
Daniel Bartlett
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dustin Ingram + Enoch Carlstrom7062% games+4.3% vs expected
Brent Moulton + Drake Moulton404 matchesnot enough data
Drake Moulton + Josh Lingreen224 matchesnot enough data
Brent Moulton + Dustin Ingram213 matchesnot enough data
Jay Swacker + Jeromie Russell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neal Manor
33W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jay Swacker
30W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Isaac Meisner
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Jordan Gieselman
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Guston Thomas
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Jeromie Russell
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Drake Moulton
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Dustin Ingram
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Enoch Carlstrom
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Brent Moulton
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Josh Lingreen
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Daniel Bartlett
4W–25L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.