Teams

Singh/Hyde RAC

2026 USTA League Tennis Mixed 18 & Over Winter-RO · 8.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-08vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesDongwook Yeo / Kelsey Jenson vs David Rider / Natalie Hagy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Stewart / Ashkan Paykar vs Mary McKie / Pete Fischer7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Routman / Caitlin Roth vs Qian Huang / Megan Reps6-4, 6-2
2026-02-22vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Hyde / Ajay Singh vs Brett Pauley / Michaela Nachtigall3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Jenson / Kelsey Jenson vs Mary McKie / Brett Carlson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaige Partain / Samuel Prabhakar vs Natalie Hagy / Qian Huang3-6, 2-6
2026-02-15vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFabricio Amorim / Mary Hyde vs Michaela Nachtigall / David Rider6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Jenson / Pamela Sinicrope vs Arjunmohan Mohan / Ani Bulbulian3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSamuel Prabhakar / Rhonda Khan vs Simon Brandt / Brittany Luther1-6, 0-6
2026-02-01vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Won 21
W#1 DoublesJodi Kruse / David Routman vs Brett Pauley / Karen Borges6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPamela Sinicrope / Ashkan Paykar vs Brett Carlson / Megan Reps6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRhonda Khan / David Jenson vs Brittany Luther / Simon Brandt2-6, 3-6
2026-01-25vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Won 21
L#1 DoublesSamuel Prabhakar / Mary Hyde vs David Rider / Natalie Hagy2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEric Hsi / Paige Partain vs Mary McKie / Pete Fischer6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Routman / Jodi Kruse vs Simon Brandt / Mabel Ryder6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-18vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Routman / Caitlin Roth vs Michaela Nachtigall / Brett Carlson5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFabricio Amorim / Mary Hyde vs Ayumu Kido / Karen Borges2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAjay Singh / Paige Partain vs Qian Huang / Megan Reps6-1, 6-4
2026-01-11vs Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stewart / Eric Hsi vs Brett Pauley / Ani Bulbulian1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDongwook Yeo / Rhonda Khan vs Natalie Hagy / Ayumu Kido1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Jenson / Kelsey Jenson vs Arjunmohan Mohan / Mabel Ryder2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 202643111022183
2Singh/Hyde RAC34101125203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
David Routman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Mary Hyde
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Dongwook Yeo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Paige Partain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Pamela Sinicrope
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Eric Hsi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Rhonda Khan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
David Jenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Caitlin Roth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Ajay Singh
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Ashkan Paykar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Fabricio Amorim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Jodi Kruse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Samuel Prabhakar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kelsey Jenson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Routman
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Mary Hyde
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Dongwook Yeo
19W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Paige Partain
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Pamela Sinicrope
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
Eric Hsi
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Rhonda Khan
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
David Jenson
2W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Caitlin Roth
22W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Ajay Singh
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Ashkan Paykar
19W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Fabricio Amorim
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Jodi Kruse
32W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Samuel Prabhakar
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kelsey Jenson
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.