Teams

Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 2026

2026 USTA League Tennis Mixed 18 & Over Winter-RO · 8.0 Mixed

17 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-08vs Singh/Hyde RACLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Rider / Natalie Hagy vs Dongwook Yeo / Kelsey Jenson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary McKie / Pete Fischer vs Jennifer Stewart / Ashkan Paykar6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesQian Huang / Megan Reps vs David Routman / Caitlin Roth4-6, 2-6
2026-02-22vs Singh/Hyde RACWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrett Pauley / Michaela Nachtigall vs Mary Hyde / Ajay Singh6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary McKie / Brett Carlson vs David Jenson / Kelsey Jenson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hagy / Qian Huang vs Paige Partain / Samuel Prabhakar6-3, 6-2
2026-02-15vs Singh/Hyde RACWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichaela Nachtigall / David Rider vs Fabricio Amorim / Mary Hyde7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesArjunmohan Mohan / Ani Bulbulian vs David Jenson / Pamela Sinicrope6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSimon Brandt / Brittany Luther vs Samuel Prabhakar / Rhonda Khan6-1, 6-0
2026-02-01vs Singh/Hyde RACLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrett Pauley / Karen Borges vs Jodi Kruse / David Routman4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrett Carlson / Megan Reps vs Pamela Sinicrope / Ashkan Paykar2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrittany Luther / Simon Brandt vs Rhonda Khan / David Jenson6-2, 6-3
2026-01-25vs Singh/Hyde RACLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Rider / Natalie Hagy vs Samuel Prabhakar / Mary Hyde6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary McKie / Pete Fischer vs Eric Hsi / Paige Partain1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSimon Brandt / Mabel Ryder vs David Routman / Jodi Kruse7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-01-18vs Singh/Hyde RACWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichaela Nachtigall / Brett Carlson vs David Routman / Caitlin Roth7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAyumu Kido / Karen Borges vs Fabricio Amorim / Mary Hyde6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesQian Huang / Megan Reps vs Ajay Singh / Paige Partain1-6, 4-6
2026-01-11vs Singh/Hyde RACWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrett Pauley / Ani Bulbulian vs Jennifer Stewart / Eric Hsi6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNatalie Hagy / Ayumu Kido vs Dongwook Yeo / Rhonda Khan6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesArjunmohan Mohan / Mabel Ryder vs David Jenson / Kelsey Jenson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mohan Mixed Nuts RTC 8.0 202643111022183
2Singh/Hyde RAC34101125203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Simon Brandt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
David Rider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Ayumu Kido
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Ani Bulbulian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Arjunmohan Mohan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Michaela Nachtigall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Luke Doskey
published
3.80
Natalie Hagy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Brett Pauley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Mary McKie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Karen Borges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Megan Reps
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Brett Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.52
Qian Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Pete Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Brittany Luther
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Mabel Ryder
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ani Bulbulian + Brett Pauley314 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Hagy + Qian Huang213 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Hagy + Brett Pauley033 matchesnot enough data
Ani Bulbulian + Arjunmohan Mohan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Simon Brandt
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
David Rider
2W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4
Ayumu Kido
10W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Ani Bulbulian
21W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Arjunmohan Mohan
25W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Michaela Nachtigall
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Luke Doskey
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Natalie Hagy
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Brett Pauley
25W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Mary McKie
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.75
Karen Borges
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Megan Reps
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Brett Carlson
84W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.63
Qian Huang
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.52
Pete Fischer
33W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Brittany Luther
21W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Mabel Ryder
18W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.