Teams

WOCC Haas / Garnett

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Mon

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-10-13vs ACAC Hoefer / CarmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesIngrid Hale / Squig Moore vs Kathie Naylor / Alicia Watkins6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-11vs HCC StinsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeyton Curdts / Sallie Mayer vs Krysten Bishop / Aynsley Fisher6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYancey Haas / Ingrid Hale vs Janine Hoffer / Susan Poulos7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2021-10-05vs Twin Hickory YuLost 01
L#1 DoublesSallie Mayer / Sharan Wilder vs Kristy Bauer / Sandra Dollar Shriner0-6, 4-6
2021-09-13vs Woodlake MorrisonWon 10
W#2 DoublesYancey Haas / Ingrid Hale vs Kara Key / Elizabeth Nottingham6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSallie Mayer / Jessica Morton vs Anne Maliff / Emily Hartman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Nikki Cheuk
published
3.98
Jessica Morton
published
3.92
Laura Granger
published 4.5
3.92
Peyton Curdts
published
3.73
Yancey Haas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ingrid Hale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Tia Thomas
published
3.36
Sallie Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Strunk
published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Garnett
published 3.5
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
2.82
Stacy Curtis
published
2.75
Sharan Wilder
published
Squig Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Curtis + Catherine Matawaran3343% games−10.4% vs expected
Ingrid Hale + Yancey Haas9654% gamesnot enough data
Sallie Mayer + Yancey Haas4160% gamesnot enough data
Laura Granger + Sallie Mayer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nikki Cheuk
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
Jessica Morton
8W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Laura Granger
131W–99L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.92
Peyton Curdts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Yancey Haas
166W–100L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ingrid Hale
88W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.54
Tia Thomas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
Sallie Mayer
85W–101L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Erin Strunk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Garnett
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Catherine Matawaran
16W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Sharan Wilder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Squig Moore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.