Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Cassie Kim
published 4
3.67
3.67
Jennifer Grant
published
3.58
Tami Lightle
published
3.54
Kimberly Caison
published
3.31
Kathleen Pruden
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
3.15
Pamela Maloney
published
3.10
Teri Frangie
published
3.10
Lori Guariento
published
2.99
Catherine Sampietro
published 3.5
2.88
Miwa Feinberg
published
Sally Krapf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Kim
29W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Jennifer Grant
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
Tami Lightle
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Kimberly Caison
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Kathleen Pruden
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 15 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Pamela Maloney
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lori Guariento
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Sampietro
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
Miwa Feinberg
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Krapf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.