Teams

Soloists

2023 Montgomery Singles Summer · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-28vs My HOmiesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEboni Lance vs Kim Dowd6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Alexis McCary2-6, 4-6
2023-08-14vs My HOmiesWon 10
W#3 SinglesEboni Lance vs Alexis McCary6-2, 6-1
2023-08-11vs Everything Bagels W4.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Riette van Laack4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Heather Sine7-6, 4-4
2023-08-05vs My HOmiesWon 20
W#1 SinglesEboni Lance vs Jemine Bryon6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Cora Ho6-1, 6-1
2023-08-02vs Everything Bagels W4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesEboni Lance vs Cecilia Jones6-0, 6-1
2023-07-25vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Kristin Quackenbush4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Allison Papadopoulos2-6, 4-6
2023-07-20vs Everything Bagels W4.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Mia Piansay6-2, 6-2
2023-07-12vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#1 SinglesAline Rodriguez vs Kristin Quackenbush1-6, 0-6
2023-07-08vs Everything Bagels W4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesEboni Lance vs Chanpen Teeranon6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrooke Schetgen vs Jelena Mitrovic6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Arina Kravitz
published 4.5
3.94
Sara Orthwein
published
3.75
Aline Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.68
3.65
Brooke Schetgen
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Maria Vassileva
published
3.47
Sean Alewine
published
3.33
Faustina Smith-Neil
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
355W–213L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
4.5
Arina Kravitz
19W–26L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
Sara Orthwein
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Aline Rodriguez
111W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Christine Alewine
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Brooke Schetgen
70W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.65
Maria Vassileva
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Sean Alewine
29W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Faustina Smith-Neil
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.