Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.0 g.Tam Leonardo Fri 7 $22

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

17 players · average NTRP 3.81 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesJoon Sung / SEAN YANG vs Nate Pualengco / Logan Triplitt6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBradley Levin vs Kartheepan Sivaguru2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNicholas Shin vs Steve Franks6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTony Lyu vs Ted Dabrowski6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Jacobs / Kahlo Vue vs Brian Benzer / Bruce Carman5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBradley Levin vs Julian Garcia4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesConstantine Hastalis / Nicholas Shin vs David Grimm / Alex Paz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJason Hui / Nicholas Shin vs Rex J Lao / Russell Needler3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKahlo Vue vs John Leubner1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChester Choi / Brian Toba vs Christopher Darnielle / Jack Trager7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesChester Choi / Brian Toba vs CARLOS TRUJILLO JR / Juan Abrahams4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBradley Levin vs Michael Gentile2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Leonardo / SEAN YANG vs Austin Ness / Robert Cimino2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Ainsworth / Nicholas Shin vs Jerome Thymes / Colin Milton6-7, 3-4
W#1 SinglesTony Lyu vs Dan Saviano7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Toba / Nicholas Shin vs Peidi Wu / Chris O'Malley1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBradley Levin vs Justin Hoehn6-7, 4-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Jacobs / Kahlo Vue vs James Barnett / Venkat Tipirneni4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.0 e.Tam Aguayo Sun 1 $227031415207
2CDTA S 18&OM4.0 c.River Trails Ciuca Fri 7:30 $246129615169
3CDTA S 18&OM4.0 b.Wheaton(OUT) Isphording Sun 2 $2052181741303
4CDTA S 18&OM4.0 h.XS Thymes Thur 7 $2234152041323
5CDTA S 18&OM4.0 f.Tam Kanev Tue 7 $2234132249353
6CDTA S 18&OM4.0 d.Oak Brook Franzo Sun 12 $2025122347333
7CDTA S 18&OM4.0 g.Tam Leonardo Fri 7 $222592655346
8z(Dropped)CDTA S 18&OM4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sun 12 $28000000
9CDTA S 18&OM4.0 i.Glenbrook Franks Sat 5 $2507112451355

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Joon Sung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Tony Lyu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Andrew Jacobs
published 4
Bradley Levin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Chester Choi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
David Shin
published 4
James Lange
published 4
3.66
Ryan Sickle
published
3.64
Paul Leonardo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Mark Ainsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
SEAN YANG
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Misha Hanson
published 3.5
Constantine Hastalis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Brian Toba
published 3.5
Jason Hui
published
Kahlo Vue
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nicholas Shin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joon Sung + SEAN YANG9260% gamesnot enough data
Mark Ainsworth + Ryan Sickle2447% gamesnot enough data
Chester Choi + Joon Sung2349% gamesnot enough data
Paul Leonardo + Joon Sung314 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Shin + Brian Toba224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Ainsworth + Kahlo Vue224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Ainsworth + Brian Toba044 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Jacobs + Misha Hanson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joon Sung
91W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
Tony Lyu
64W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Andrew Jacobs
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Bradley Levin
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Chester Choi
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Shin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
James Lange
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Sickle
52W–31L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Paul Leonardo
91W–64L career · 1 line in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Mark Ainsworth
52W–93L career · 1 line in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
SEAN YANG
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Misha Hanson
77W–47L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Constantine Hastalis
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brian Toba
161W–101L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jason Hui
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kahlo Vue
34W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Shin
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.