Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.0 c.River Trails Ciuca Fri 7:30 $24

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

17 players · average NTRP 4.09 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesTyler Ko vs Brian Green6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCurtis Allen / Tyrin Wages vs Anthony Noti / Jason Richardson6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDerek Kaden vs Matt Lorentsen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarlos Flores / Rafael Lozada vs Scott Moss / Kevin Onorato6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRafael Lozada / Tyrin Wages vs Lawrence Mabes / Douglas Kelley6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesZoltan Fogarasi vs Edgar Garcia6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJazz Burks / Derek Kaden vs Leo Kanev / Erik Swanson5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAdrian Ciuca / Gregg Rousseau vs Eric Rodrigo / Rick Aguayo6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTyler Ko vs Felix Danciu4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarlos Alcantar / Tyrin Wages vs John Leubner / James Brown4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRafael Lozada / Carlos Flores vs Russell Needler / Rex J Lao6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAdrian Ciuca / Hazem Isawi vs Robert Cimino / Austin Ness3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGregg Rousseau vs Ty Caughell6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRafael Lozada / Carlos Flores vs Juan Abrahams / CARLOS TRUJILLO JR6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCarlos Flores / Rafael Lozada vs Emmett Johnson / Chris O'Malley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIgor Gogov / Curtis Allen vs Peidi Wu / Saverio Suraci6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDerek Kaden vs Kartheepan Sivaguru0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGregg Rousseau vs Edward Graft6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.0 e.Tam Aguayo Sun 1 $227031415207
2CDTA S 18&OM4.0 c.River Trails Ciuca Fri 7:30 $246129615169
3CDTA S 18&OM4.0 b.Wheaton(OUT) Isphording Sun 2 $2052181741303
4CDTA S 18&OM4.0 h.XS Thymes Thur 7 $2234152041323
5CDTA S 18&OM4.0 f.Tam Kanev Tue 7 $2234132249353
6CDTA S 18&OM4.0 d.Oak Brook Franzo Sun 12 $2025122347333
7CDTA S 18&OM4.0 g.Tam Leonardo Fri 7 $222592655346
8z(Dropped)CDTA S 18&OM4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sun 12 $28000000
9CDTA S 18&OM4.0 i.Glenbrook Franks Sat 5 $2507112451355

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gregg Rousseau
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Carlos Alcantar
published 4.5
4.08
Ionut Rus
published 4
4.07
Adrian Ciuca
published 4
4.03
Rafael Lozada
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.99
Hazem Isawi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Igor Gogov
published 4
3.84
Tyrin Wages
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Jazz Burks
published 4
3.75
Brett Wangman
published 4
Curtis Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Derek Kaden
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Zeno Popa
published
3.62
Michael Hong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Jason Leung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tyler Ko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Zoltan Fogarasi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hong + Jason Leung9461% games+11.6% vs expected
Adrian Ciuca + Hazem Isawi12264% games+9.0% vs expected
Adrian Ciuca + Rafael Lozada8062% games+6.9% vs expected
Brett Wangman + Hazem Isawi14461% games+5.9% vs expected
Brett Wangman + Ionut Rus8655% games+5.6% vs expected
Ionut Rus + Zeno Popa5062% games+4.8% vs expected
Brett Wangman + Zeno Popa8458% games+3.9% vs expected
Adrian Ciuca + Zeno Popa271555% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gregg Rousseau
104W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Carlos Alcantar
92W–47L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Ionut Rus
141W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Adrian Ciuca
263W–157L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
4.07
4
Rafael Lozada
223W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Hazem Isawi
78W–19L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Igor Gogov
193W–84L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
Tyrin Wages
42W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Jazz Burks
229W–226L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Brett Wangman
118W–100L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Curtis Allen
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Derek Kaden
21W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Zeno Popa
59W–45L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Michael Hong
126W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.62
Jason Leung
43W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Tyler Ko
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Zoltan Fogarasi
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.