Teams

SFV - Chix & Dix Old School

2023 Mixed 40+ SFV Spring · SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesDarren Chu / Michelle Parent vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-17vs SFV - Serve Ace AahsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Perryman / Michael Cox vs Judy Maly / John Maly3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Parent / David Hittelman vs Elizabeth Hackelton / Harris Hall1-6, 4-6
2023-05-21vs SFV LLW - The 300's - Aldo ArganaLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Russell Baingo vs Ofer Shalom / Tanya Thompson5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Parent / Rod Shimamoto vs Aldo Angrisani / Ivette Dunlop1-6, 2-6
2023-05-06vs SFV - Nice AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Perryman / David Stokols vs CAROLINA MEDINA / Alan Esguerra4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Parent / Michael Cox vs Lisa Bourne / Edmond Avedisian3-6, 4-6
2023-04-23vs SFV - Nice AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Perryman / Rod Shimamoto vs Maureen Shideh / Edmond Avedisian3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Diane Perryman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
3.73
MJ Nejad
published
3.65
Kathrina Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.61
Robin Hittelman
published 4
3.56
Mikaela Nagler
published
3.39
Lisa Gechtman
published
3.27
Michelle Parent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.12
Deborah McGaughey
published 3.5
Julie Juliani
published
Russell Baingo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathrina Cruz + Darren Chu404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
MJ Nejad
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 1 line in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Robin Hittelman
76W–110L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Mikaela Nagler
26W–40L career · no lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
3.56
Lisa Gechtman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Michelle Parent
104W–137L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Deborah McGaughey
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Russell Baingo
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.