Teams

WOCC Kramer-Sauvigne

2024 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-20vs RMC SweeneyWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSallie Mayer / Ainsley Crowell vs Brenda Tyson / Lynne Moore6-4, 6-4
2024-05-19vs Woodlake K. HannonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesZinie Sampson / Kelly Stalls vs Robin Oldt / Beth Bell6-4, 6-1
2024-05-13vs Raintree RansoneWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSallie Mayer / Ainsley Crowell vs Shannon Foster / Sarah Gallagher2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-29vs Hermitage LinesWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesKelly Stalls / Zinie Sampson vs Stacey Haug / Joanna Bergeron6-3, 6-3
2024-04-22vs Rhodes BonairWon 20
W#2 Female DoublesRebecca Hendrix / Sule Sauvigne vs Eleanor Gardner / Donna Lawson6-3, 6-3
W#3 Female DoublesSallie Mayer / Beth Kelly vs Pamela Blackburn / Paige Wesselink6-3, 6-3
2024-04-15vs Westwood Boss Babes - SeredniWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesRebecca Hendrix / Sule Sauvigne vs Caren Payne / Sarah Thomas6-3, 7-6
2024-04-08vs CCV BealeSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesSallie Mayer / Zinie Sampson vs Catherine Benevento / Mary Beth Scott1-6, 0-6
W#3 Female DoublesSule Sauvigne / Rebecca Hendrix vs Paige Forrest / Charlotte Hupp7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kelly Stalls
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Rebecca Hendrix
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.37
Sallie Mayer
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Jenny Norfleet
published
3.20
Ainsley Crowell
published 3.5
3.10
Meredith Miles
published
3.08
Zinie Sampson
published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
2.83
Stacy Curtis
published
2.65
Beth Kelly
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Stalls
146W–144L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Rebecca Hendrix
49W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sallie Mayer
85W–101L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jenny Norfleet
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Ainsley Crowell
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Meredith Miles
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Kelly
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.