Teams

Me.Everitt18T3.0

2024 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-24vs Sk.Poole18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Lisa Austin vs Stephanie Ferrell / Lowry Liggon0-6, 0-6
2024-07-20vs Ki.Patrey18TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCathy Joyce / Janet Sprague vs Emily Childs / Kimberly Patrey6-2, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Heather Hofmann vs Emily Larson / Heather Tuttle5-7, 1-6
2024-07-13vs Ch.Burr18T3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Austin / Niezle Scott vs Elizabeth Enderline / Lynelle Clark6-4, 6-3
2024-06-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Lisa Austin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-15vs Je.Komes18T3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Cathy Joyce vs Erin Farleigh / Meagan Rietz3-6, 1-6
2024-06-08vs Pa.Hankerson18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Lisa Austin vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Michelle Mills7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-05vs Bl.Leippe18T3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Heather Hofmann vs Bladen Leippe / Wendy Sielaty6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Cathy Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Erin McAllister
published
3.71
Janet Sprague
published
3.33
Zana Piric
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Laura Munster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Melyssa Kemp
published 3.5
3.16
Lan Bello
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Elizabeth Schuette
published
3.08
Camille Gibbs
published 3.5
2.85
Niezle Scott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Heather Hofmann
published
2.54
Dana McNally
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Munster + Lan Bello3449% gamesnot enough data
Zana Piric + Lan Bello1537% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Schuette + Camille Gibbs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Joyce
123W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
Erin McAllister
26W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Janet Sprague
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Laura Munster
48W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Melyssa Kemp
132W–104L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Lan Bello
73W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Schuette
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Camille Gibbs
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Niezle Scott
39W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Heather Hofmann
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Dana McNally
32W–67L career · type A · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.