Teams

Hitchcock 4.5M 40s Tues

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.5 40 & Over Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-10vs Rosario 4.5M 40s TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJay Hitchcock / Brian Johnson vs Neil Henderson / Jonathan Sawyer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-06vs Rosario 4.5M 40s TuesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJay Hitchcock / Brian Johnson vs William Feehan / Neil Henderson6-1, 6-3
2024-04-02vs Rosario 4.5M 40s TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Johnson / Brooks Jackson vs Neil Henderson / Jonathan Sawyer5-7, 4-6
2024-03-19vs Rosario 4.5M 40s TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Johnson / Tapio Martti vs Chris Chapman / Ziad Fleihan3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 40 & Over Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
David Leatherwood
published 4.5
4.19
Jay Hitchcock
published
4.15
Kenny Winter
published
4.11
Brooks Jackson
published 4.5
4.09
Christopher Crouch
published 4.5
4.06
Brian Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.02
Dan Clemson
published 4.5
4.02
Wilson Paine
published
3.90
Johan Nordmark
published
3.70
Amiel Rossabi
published 4
Mark Lapierre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenny Winter + Brooks Jackson5159% games+7.3% vs expected
Jay Hitchcock + Brooks Jackson2348% games−10.1% vs expected
Amiel Rossabi + Johan Nordmark314 matchesnot enough data
Kenny Winter + Jay Hitchcock314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Leatherwood
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
Jay Hitchcock
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Kenny Winter
41W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
4.15
4.5
Brooks Jackson
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Christopher Crouch
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Brian Johnson
127W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Dan Clemson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
Wilson Paine
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Johan Nordmark
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Amiel Rossabi
20W–23L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Mark Lapierre
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.