← Search

Michael Taft

University Place, WA
0.0 year-end
66 matches · 14W–52L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Michael sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Michael is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Michael has gone from the 35th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
12.5%
5W–35L · 32.5% of games
6.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
L
Faye Imsande / Douglas Scott
2022-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Hutchison
−0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Wayne Mazikowski / Dan Lombardo
2022-11-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Hutchison
+0.055better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Mark Dodson / Ted Bailey
2022-11-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Staeheli
−0.042below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Zheng Ge
−0.043below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Raul Bacas / Marc Medeiros
2022-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allan Davis
−0.059below expectation — took 39% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Zheng Ge
−0.076below expectation — took 37% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Richard Bevan / Denny Onslowchamps
2022-06-25 · #3 Doubles · with Tim Morley
+0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Steve Lien / Kevin Keilerchamps
2022-06-25 · #3 Doubles · with Richard Hutchison
+0.029better than expected — took 44% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norm Dillon
−0.062below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-03-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Hutchison
+0.043better than expected — took 56% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Rich Scheele / Todd Smith
2022-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Baird
+0.050better than expected — took 58% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Hutchison
+0.022better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.