← Search

Todd Raymond

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 61W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Todd Raymond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-03-08 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-21 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-31 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-01-25 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-12 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Fogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-05-10 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-05 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Greninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-02-22 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Fogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-02 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-01-19 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Dannemiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-01-12 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-05-26 · TCSP-Hartvigson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Hartvigson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 71.8% of games
4.5
78.4%
29W–8L · 61% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams