← Search

Josh Fogt

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 71W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Josh Fogt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-05-31 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Auriemma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tam Ly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-31 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Halos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-01-12 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-18 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Auriemma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-05-10 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jerit Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-25 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Greninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-02-28 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Greninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2025-02-22 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Raymond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games
4.5
62.3%
38W–23L · 54.5% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe