← Search

Richard Wies

— year-end
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Richard Wies to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
W
2021-05-08 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Forscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2021-04-18 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Forscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-04-11 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John M Dusza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-03-27 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Holway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2021-03-20 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Sobolewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2020-11-15 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John M Dusza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2020-10-04 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Holway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2019-06-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Stephen Sasson
2019-03-30 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
James Niejadlik / Gary Scharf
2019-03-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Dinauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
David Cote / Andy Strickler
2019-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Fasulo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2019-01-19 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams3 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#1 Singles
31%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer