← Search

Linda Fleiderman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Malibu, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 18W–25L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history43 matches
W
2025-04-23 · CV LLW-Mission Hills/Schlappi & Polisky · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vickki Schlappi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-18 · CV LLW-Mission Hills/Schlappi & Polisky · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vickki Schlappi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-04-16 · CV LLW-Mission Hills/Schlappi & Polisky · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brenda Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-11-03 · SoCal/Polisky/65&Over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vickki Schlappi championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-04-12 · SoCal/Polisky/65&Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vickki Schlappi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-04-10 · SoCal/Polisky/65&Over9.0W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sheree Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-04-07 · SoCal/Polisky/65&Over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vickki Schlappi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-03-27 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barbara Eriksson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-03-10 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-20 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shaughne Warnack
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-09 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anita Kamouri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-03-31 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Sutherland & V Brown · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sherrell Sutherland
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.7% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert