← Search

Sherrell Sutherland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indian Wells, CA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 15W–22L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history37 matches
L
2024-05-10 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Lisa Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cristin Leverte
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-28 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Lisa Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Hayes
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-04-21 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Lisa Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cristin Leverte
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-04-14 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Lisa Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Hayes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-04-07 · CV-La Quinta Resort/Lisa Morgan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Morgan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-27 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-06 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-01-09 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Tucker & Sutherland · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-03-31 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Sutherland & V Brown · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Linda Fleiderman
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
Anne Medzegian / Brenda Williams
2022-02-07 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Sutherland & V Brown · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brenda Williams
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-02-05 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Warnack & V Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Williams
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-12-12 · CV-Shadow Mountain/Sutherland & Warnack · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Williams
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 48.1% of games
9.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova