← Search

Carol Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 3W–9L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-02-22 · NAPA V CC 40AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie John
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-07 · NAPA V CC 40AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Jane Holman
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-09 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karin Oliver
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-04 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Palmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-12 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-25 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Levin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-27 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Palmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-02-22 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Palmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-02-09 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Tarantino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-06 · NorCal/Lum/65&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Davino
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2023-03-17 · NorCal/Lum/65&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Wakerlin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-03-03 · NorCal/Lum/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
20%
2W–8L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams