← Search

Mary Palmer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Yountville, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 5W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-03-24 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Lum
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-12 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Levin
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-11 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Tupper
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-04 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-21 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Lum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-06 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vi Gianaras
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-10 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robynne Piggott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-19 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Lum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-07 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2024-02-27 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-02-22 · NAPA V CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-04-06 · NorCal/Lum/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Wakerlin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 36.4% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe