← Search

Catherine Breyer

Henderson, NV
0.0 year-end
73 matches · 41W–32L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Catherine sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Catherine is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Catherine has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Catherine has gone from the 75th to the 53rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
56.9%
37W–28L · 53.3% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
L
Heather George / Christine McNaught
2022-10-24 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Ford
−0.079below expectation — took 20% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Tricia Miller / Diona Fonte
2022-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Turner
−0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Cheryl Schwartz / Anne Alba
2022-09-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Argier
−0.016about as expected — took 62% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Mary Stengel / Karen Regin
2022-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Kelbel
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-05-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Taylor
−0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kelley Bailey / Anne Alba
2022-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Johnson
+0.047better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Argier
−0.017about as expected — took 62% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Amy Pan / Sandi Martin
2022-03-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pilar Grimes
−0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Susan Langer / Karen Soderberg
2022-03-14 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Johnson
−0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Patti Tolli / Mimi Liu
2022-03-07 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Johnson
+0.025better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-02-14 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Taylor
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Taylor
−0.028below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.