Search

Tim Anderson

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
29 matches · 10W–19L · seasons 20192024
Where Tim sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Tim is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams22 teams · 2009–2024
WHRC-Potter
2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2024
WHRC-Jennings
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
WHRC-Prince/Ambard
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
WHRC-Fjeldsted
2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2020
WHRC-Waters/Lofts
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2020
WHRC-Fjeldsted
2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2020
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tim has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 28.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history29 matches
L
2024-02-24 · WHRC-Potter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Anderson
+0.000about as expected — took 20% of games against 21% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-01-26 · WHRC-Potter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Anderson
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Joong Kim / James Yang
2022-10-23 · WHRC-Jennings · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Kirk
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-09-26 · WHRC-Jennings · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Press
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-09-17 · WHRC-Jennings · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randolph Splitter
+0.029better than expected — took 52% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
JIN PARK / Seung Won Lee
2022-06-04 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Press
0.052below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2022-05-15 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Willits
+0.048better than expected — took 100% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-05-08 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Khozein
+0.012better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
David Lee / Jungyoon Kim
2022-04-08 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sumit Gupta
0.018below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Karen Lettiere / Andrew Kohlmetzmixed
2020-02-15 · WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Anderson
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2020-02-08 · WHRC-Waters/Lofts · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Hall
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Mary Anne Sweeney / Joe Malboeufmixed
2020-02-02 · WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Davidson
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 20% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.