← Search

Angie Fadness

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Anthony, ID
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 30W–31L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history61 matches
L
2024-06-11 · Lightheart · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-29 · Lightheart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-15 · Hulse · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Nef
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-4
L
Melanie Smith / Nadine Ball
2023-05-12 · Hulse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Nef
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-09 · Nelson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margo Nef
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
Vicki Krogstrand / Melanie Smith
2023-05-08 · Hulse · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Nef
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-05 · Nelson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margo Nef
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-08-21 · Blatter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-08-20 · Blatter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Gardner championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2022-08-19 · Blatter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-08-19 · Blatter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amie Belnap championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-08-11 · Blatter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
25W–15L · 55.2% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 42.6% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal