← Search

Gail Case

Everett, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
61 matches · 29W–32L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Gail sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Gail is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gail has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Gail has gone from the 29th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 57.4% of games
3.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 39.6% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.4% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
2024-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Fahey
−0.035below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Lisa Lemperes / Precious Bryngelson
2024-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Cockrell
−0.045below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Iffrig
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Hanson
−0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yasmine Hejazi
−0.009about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Tracy
+0.017about as expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Tracy
−0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Tracy
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-05-13 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.058below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Joy Bean Lowe
2022-05-08 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.017below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Lang
+0.015about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-04-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.019better than expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.