← Search

Erin Richardson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
COLFAX, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 98W–117L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history215 matches
L
2026-05-12 · Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Doupe
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Gekas
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-17 · Egerton 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Hilburn
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Doupe
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-10 · Egerton 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Riley
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · Egerton 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Parr
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
David Bruner / Susan Fekete
2025-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hjelt mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-07 · Bryce 40+ 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Bryce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
Wendy Parker / Jennifer Alexander
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Hilburn championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Hilburn championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Hilburn championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Egerton championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.7%
52W–43L · 52.5% of games
4.5
28.8%
15W–37L · 44.5% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.1% of games
8.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.4% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 53.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
36 matches
#1 Singles
14%
30 matches
#2 Singles
14%
30 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer