Search

Jill Sutherin

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
115 matches · 48W–67L · seasons 20192025
Where Jill sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jill is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jill has gone from the 75th to the 61st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.8% of games
4.5
37.6%
35W–58L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history115 matches
L
Lisa Diehr / Kristen Jacobschamps
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Pham
+0.040better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amy Black / Tricia Sederbergchamps
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Jenny Grob
0.011below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Stephanie Wiesing / Beth Daychamps
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Jenny Grob
+0.025better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Valerie Scheevel / Danielle Smithchamps
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Sorrentino
0.021below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Teddy Stantcheva
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
April Denise Belcher / Desiree Kathmannchamps
2025-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Teddy Stantcheva
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-17 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Sorrentino
+0.024better than expected — took 54% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Rogers
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Laura Sumpter / Samantha Schwartz
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
+0.066better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Anahi Sanchez / Carli Fettig
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huong Nardelli
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
+0.058better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Rogers
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.