← Search

Catalin Cozmei

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 12W–20L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history32 matches
W
2026-03-13 · PSC-Zhou · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tian Ouyang
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-17 · PSC-Ifrim · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clement Ifrim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-10 · PSC-Ifrim · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claudiu Bulai
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-04 · PSC-Ifrim · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ales Novak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-09-26 · PSC-Ifrim · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Hsiao
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-09-20 · PSC-Ifrim · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clement Ifrim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-27 · PSC-Rogal-Petriuc · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irina Petriuc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-21 · PSC-Poli18-Onu · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-13 · PSC-Poli18-Onu · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-02-18 · PSC-Poli-Onu · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-09-09 · NWW-PSC-Petriuc · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beatrice Oltean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-06 · PSC-Poli-Dragusanu · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlos Gomes
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 48.5% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe