← Search

Andrew Selsky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salem, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
18 matches · 3W–15L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history18 matches
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Humphrey mixed championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Humphrey mixed championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · SOR-STSC-Rasmussen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cristina Ford mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · STSC Lui-Hansen/Stahl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sybille Dejonge mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kirsten Rey-Rosa mixed championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kirsten Rey-Rosa mixed championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-08 · S OR-STSC-Rasmussen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kirsten Rey-Rosa mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-07 · S OR-STSC-Rasmussen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kirsten Rey-Rosa mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2019-11-03 · STSC Stahl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Garland
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2019-10-27 · STSC Stahl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ronald Jaecks
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2019-10-26 · STSC Stahl · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carl Hauser
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2019-10-19 · STSC Stahl · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ronald Jaecks
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.8% of games
6.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#2 Singles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams