← Search

Suzanne Anderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 22W–24L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history46 matches
W
2025-07-01 · Aston · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katherine English
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-24 · Aston · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Flurry Yanez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-09-09 · NORFOLK - Claxton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tijen Ireland
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-07-22 · NORFOLK - Claxton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-12 · Team Kezman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-07-08 · Team Kezman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Phillips
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-24 · Team Kezman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Jett
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-21 · Team Kezman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-11 · Team Kezman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-12-11 · Jordan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-12-01 · Jordan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-11-03 · Jordan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Hennessy
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 35.2% of games
4.0
50%
17W–17L · 49.9% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer