← Search

Maria Nevarez

— year-end
36 matches · 26W–10L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Maria Nevarez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2021-08-03 · NWO 18&Over 4.5W Tues Stearns/Pacella-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Didi Thomason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2021-08-02 · NWO 18&Over 4.5W Tues Stearns/Pacella-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Didi Thomason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-07-13 · NWO 18&Over 4.5W Tues Stearns/Pacella-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Didi Thomason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2021-06-01 · NWO 18&Over 4.5W Tues Stearns/Pacella-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Spinazze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-05-25 · NWO 18&Over 4.5W Tues Stearns/Pacella-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindy Mikolajewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2020-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dana Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Amanda Smith / Gemma Smith
2020-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dana Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-3, 1-0
W
2020-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dana Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-6, 1-0
W
2020-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julieann Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Gemma Smith / Amanda Smith
2020-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dana Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2, 0-1
W
2020-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julieann Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2020-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Hausman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.2% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 52% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.9% of games
8.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams