← Search

Margaret Elofson

Fircrest, WA
0.0 year-end
62 matches · 47W–15L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Margaret sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Margaret is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Margaret has gone from the 98th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 60.8% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 38.9% of games
7.0
80%
12W–3L · 60.9% of games
8.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history62 matches
L
2021-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McHugh
−0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Jan Koenig / Pam Freierchamps
2021-09-17 · #2 Doubles · with Marcie Osborn
−0.012below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McHugh
−0.026below expectation — took 52% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Phyllis Lindsey / Charlet Herrick
2021-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcie Osborn
+0.018better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2021-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Hurst
+0.007below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Mary Hayden / Lee Parkinson
2021-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary McHugh
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-02-27 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Donahue
−0.014below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2020-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy McPhee
−0.071below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2020-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy McPhee
+0.009better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2020-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chong Hilger
+0.032better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Jennifer Smith / Teresa Myers
2020-01-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chong Hilger
+0.023better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-12-15 · #1 Doubles · with Chong Hilger
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.