Robyn Ziperski
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
87 matches · 54W–33L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history87 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2024
Refunded
Ro.Ziperski55A
Ta.LeFevre40C
J.Komes
Ka.Serow55C6.5
Ka.Wakeford40C
R.Ziperski 3.0 55+
Ro.Ziperski40C
Ro.Ziperski55C
Ta.LeFevre55T
DLaugheryNRCC
KWakeford
LeFevre 6.5 55+
RZiperski
RZiperski
Refunds-LLC use only
TLeFevre 55+ Tri-Level
IAJones 5.5 40+
*IRZiPERSKI
IAJones
ICGodwin/Sherman
IDLanier
ITLefevre 55+ 6.5
ITPerrone
IBWait
ICteam/IChesson
IDAldridge
IDKAGAN
IJMillikan Sweet Shots
IKHumphrey/Backhanded Compliments
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 53.6% of games
5.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 62.6% of games
6.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 52.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.